ABSTRACT
Introdução: Nas reconstruções de mama com implante é incomum a ptose no decorrer do tempo, fato não observado nas mamoplastias de simetrização, principalmente sem implantes, ocasionando precocemente a recidiva da assimetria mamária. O objetivo desse trabalho foi demonstrar a mamoplastia de simetrização contralateral com uso de implantes submusculares e os resultados alcançados. Métodos: No período de 2 anos foram estudados, retrospectivamente, 18 casos de mamoplastia de simetrização com implante submuscular. Resultados: A comorbidade mais encontrada foi a obesidade, com p = 0,007. As pacientes obesas tiveram maior volume de tecido mamário ressecado, com p = 0,0013. O acompanhamento médio foi de 13 meses. A taxa de reoperação foi de 5,5% (1 caso) devido à pseudoptose. Não houve infecção dos implantes. As complicações encontradas foram: necrose parcial do complexo areolopapilar em 1 caso, deiscência superficial de ferida em 1 caso, seroma em 3 casos e dor moderada em 3 casos. Conclusão: A mamoplastia de simetrização contralateral com uso de implantes submusculares, associada ao adequado esvaziamento do tecido mamário, proporcionou resultados duradouros com baixo índice de complicações, minimizando as sequelas decorrentes da mastectomia.
Introduction: In breast reconstruction with implants, ptosis is uncommon over time, in contrast to symmetrization mammoplasty without implants, which causes premature recurrence of breast asymmetry. The objective of this study was to describe the procedure and results of contralateral symmetrization mammoplasty with the use of submuscular implants. Methods: A total of 18 cases of symmetrization mammoplasty with submuscular implants performed over a 2-year period were retrospectively studied. Results: The most common comorbidity was obesity (p = 0.007). Obese patients had a higher volume of resected breast tissue (p = 0.0013). The mean follow-up was 13 months. The reoperation rate was 5.5% (1 case) for pseudoptosis. There were no implant infections. Complications included partial necrosis of the nipple-areola complex in 1 case, superficial wound dehiscence in 1 case, seroma in 3 cases, and moderate pain in 3 cases. Conclusion: Contralateral symmetrization mammoplasty with submuscular implants, associated with adequate emptying of breast tissue, provided long-lasting results with a low rate of complications, minimizing the sequelae of mastectomy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , History, 21st Century , Prostheses and Implants , Breast , Breast Neoplasms , Medical Records , Retrospective Studies , Mammaplasty , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Mastectomy , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Prostheses and Implants/ethics , Breast/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Medical Records/standards , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/rehabilitation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Mastectomy/methodsABSTRACT
La gran demanda estética y funcional hace que cada día se intenten disminuir más los tiempos de espera para cargar los implantes en los tratamientos con pacientes desdentados, surgiendo la carga inmediata como hecho biofísico de someter a carga masticatoria funcional uno o varios implantes en las primeras 24 horas de su implantación. Con el objetivo de caracterizar el procedimiento de carga inmediata como alternativa de tratamiento, se realizó una exhaustiva revisión de 22 bibliografías, consultando a autores como Bechelli, Maló, Degidi, Uribe, entre otros especialistas en el tema. El éxito del tratamiento puede alcanzarse con una correcta selección y evaluación del paciente, teniendo en cuenta la calidad ósea y la estabilidad inicial del implante. El procedimiento quirúrgico se simplifica haciendo esta técnica más confiable y ofreciéndole ventajas como: estética en un mismo tiempo quirúrgico, conformación de la arquitectura gingival, elevación de la calidad de vida y confort de nuestros pacientes.
The big aesthetics and functional demand makes to try to decrease more the time of waiting to load the implants in the treatments in edentulism patients appearing the immediate load as a biophysics fact to submit to a masticatory functional load one or several implants in the first 24 hours of it implantation. In order to characterize the procedure of immediate load like an alternative of treatment. It has been realized an exhaustive revision of 22 bibliographies consulting to authors such as Bechelli, Maló, Degidi, Uribe between other specialist in the topic. The success of the treatment can be reaching with a correct selection and evaluation of the patient, bearing in mind the ossea quality and the initial stability of the implant. The surgical procedure is simplified making this technical more reliable, it offers advantages such as: aesthetics in the same surgical time, conformation of the gingival architecture, elevation of the quality of life and the comfort of our patients.